Tag: WebDev

You can now get up to 33% off the price of a cPanel-managed Web Hosting plan at Heart Internet.

Did you know that the fonts you use on your website can impact the way your customers perceive and interact with your brand?

Including options for optimising your cart, boosting customer loyalty, and selling tickets.

Discover the appeal of .ninja, .coffee, .guru and more - all available in our domain name sale.

We’ve just slashed the price of WordPress Hosting at Heart Internet.

A guide to what to do next once you've chosen your perfect domain name.

Including quotes from Amelia Earhart and Barack Obama, to give you a little pick me up.

When browsing through hosting packages, you’ll often come across the word cPanel. But what exactly does this word mean and what are the benefits of buying a hosting package with cPanel included?

Did you know that domains can be so much more than a mere address or waymark? In this blog, we look at how they can be a powerful tool for online brand protection.

Celebrating World Wide Web Day by looking at why it's never been more important to have an online presence.

I have a software RAID 5 with 3 disks. For a few days, sda has been giving errors, and today the new disk arrived. I launched mdadm --replace and the process started correctly, but due to read errors on the disk, the operation is taking a very long time (over a week for about 1TB). Should I be patient, or can I use --remove sda? And force the recovery using parity information instead? What do you recommend?

I want to setup a mail rule so that when users email everyone@ or allusers@ (basically a distro list with the entire company in it), if they put everyone@ in the To field, it will automatically remove this from the To and put it in the Bcc instead. This way, when someone inevitably hits reply or reply all, the entire company doesn't get spammed. I could do this in MS Exchange with an outgoing mail rule. How do I do this with Gmail? In Content Compliance, I can match on the recipients' header, but I do not see how to add the BCC.

Here's how I currently (mis)understand how it works : everytime I run borg create /path/to/my/repo::[archive name] /home/myData Borg creates a new archive. Thanks to the deduplication mechanism, this archive : contains the data chunks that were not seen before (basically : new files and data added to existing files) "links" (referring to previous archives) to the data chunks that are already known + stored by Borg Meaning that, if I create successive archives with the borg create [...] command above : the archive_1 has a full copy of /home/myData as of the day I ran that command for the first time thanks to the deduplication mechanism, the archive_2 only has the chunks of data I added to /home/myData since the creation of archive_1 ... the archive_n only has the

We're running a Rocky Linux 8 (so, essentially RHEL 8) shop and I've been tasked with investigating ACLs on filesystems mounted via NFS. We're using FreeIPA/IdM as well. I've set up a test machine, enrolled it in IdM, exported an NFS share, and mounted it locally, but the ACL part seems to be lacking: [root@example ~]# cat /etc/exports /export/ *(rw,acl,no_root_squash) [root@example ~]# mount | grep /export localhost:/export on /mnt type nfs4 (rw,relatime,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp6,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=::1,local_lock=none,addr=::1) [root@example ~]# cd /mnt/ [root@example mnt]# touch testfile [root@example mnt]# getfacl testfile # file: testfile # owner: root # group: root user::rw- group::r-- other::r-- [root@example mnt]# setfacl -m u:user:r testfile setfacl: testfile: Operation not supported A couple of questions: Is it correctly understood that I should be using

i have Proliant ML350 Windows server 2012R2 .. The device is currently working, but sometimes the device shuts down for an unknown reason on my part, a red light appears, and it does not turn on again without removing the power cable from the device and installing it again.enter image description here As shown in the picture

I was curious about the use of Nginx or Apache servers. I know that they are very important and almost all internet services are built using either of these but I do not understand the definition that Apache is a server. My main confusion is this: Locally, I can develop a backend server and serve the requests coming to the backend (for example, I can code a NodeJS application and put it in a server on the cloud). Then, what is the point of using Nginx or Apache? What do they specifically provide that makes them important. I am sorry if it sounds like a silly question.

I have a scenario where I need all dns requests not handled by azure dns to be forwarded to public external dns resolvers for security reasons. There is an allow list for which ips can access this service but as far as I can tell private resolver outbound endpoints don't have a dedicated public ip address that's exposed to me. 2 questions can I create an outbound catch all rule with . that'd be honored last? Meaning I could at least forward. do I need another resolver between the private resolver service and the external resolver with a pip? Since by definition it's a "private" resolver I'm assuming I can't access a pip for it. The forward look ups would look like this, where I'm not sure if I need the internal resolver in italics vnet -> fw proxy -> private resolver service (outbound rule) -> internal resolver with pip -> external resolver

How can we ensure that copied and moved items inherit the permissions of the destination after moving the item from the parent folder on the same volume? When an Antek user copies or moves a scan from the SCANS folder to the Office or Company folder, the Mikołaj, Filip, Natalia and Maciej users do not see the selected file. We have set an entry in the registry according to https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-client/windows-security/permissions-on-copying-moving-files Value name: MoveSecurityAttributes Data type: DWORD Value data: 0 Unfortunately it didn't help.

I've got RAID1 array (4 HDD) from old dead system. Need to reassemble that RAID1 array on a new system. Old and dead linux system was installed to one separate HDD (which is unrecoverable dead) and that RAID1-array was used as mounted data storage. So I've seen that as one big ~9Tb storage. Never done that before and very important to save data on that HDD array. So it is not time to experiments, and I'm afraid to damage data. How to safely reassemble that RAID1 array on new system? Some information [>] RAID1 was created by command on the old system: mkfs.btrfs -f -L data -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc/ dev/sdd Here are 2 HDD pairs that is assembled to one big virtual disk. Then it was mounted in /etc/fstab with options 'defaults,compress=zlib' [>] RAID1 disk array is labeled as 'data' on new system: nas@nas:~$ sudo lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,SIZE,MOUNTP

I work in academia. We have three Linux servers where many users read, write, and create files all the time. Over the years, the servers have become bloated, with many files copied among multiple directories and across all three servers. Is there an application that runs on Linux that can safely delete all the duplicate files? Ideally, it would replace the deleted files with a symlink pointing to the original file.